How NailWiki reviews documents and claims

NailWiki

Help nail professionals understand the reasoning behind their everyday choices: materials, techniques, equipment and the limits of available evidence. The library separates source-based explanations, manufacturer claims and commercial resources.

What these reviews assess

Current review articles are documentary analyses. They assess public product information, databases and guidance. They do not include our own hands-on performance measurements, product rankings or an independent specialist’s verdict.

Document review method

Identify the document, publisher, version and date. Define the question being assessed, read the relevant passages and distinguish explicit statements from interpretation. Record missing test conditions and avoid extending evidence beyond the system, sample or circumstances actually described.

Sources and evidence

Primary sources are preferred where available: original research, official guidance, public databases and manufacturer documentation. Manufacturer descriptions establish what a brand claims, not independent proof of efficacy, safety or compatibility. Dates and the scope of the available evidence matter.

Specialist review status

The published library does not currently identify an independent specialist reviewer for these articles. AI-assisted source checks are disclosed on each article and must not be presented as a medical review, professional accreditation or independent product test.

NailWiki, BELOM, NailMarket, BELOM App and NaNails are projects of BELOM Group OÜ, as identified by the owner. Molokom catalogue images are supplied through our NaNails shop; this commercial relationship is not independent product-test evidence. Editorial conclusions are not sold. Project advertising is labelled; common ownership is not an independent product test.

NailWiki, BELOM, NailMarket, BELOM App and NaNails are projects of BELOM Group OÜ, as identified by the owner. Molokom catalogue images are supplied through our NaNails shop; this commercial relationship is not independent product-test evidence. Editorial conclusions are not sold. Project advertising is labelled; common ownership is not an independent product test.

Send an error report to info@belom.eu with the article URL, the disputed passage and a supporting source. A substantive correction records what changed and why; an AI review is not a specialist sign-off.

Send an error report to info@belom.eu with the article URL, the disputed passage and a supporting source. A substantive correction records what changed and why; an AI review is not a specialist sign-off.